This is why folks haven’t been allowed to rebuild after Sandy. From cnsnews.com:
The federal government announced on Monday that it is remapping storm-damaged areas of the East Coast, a move that will contribute to new “resilience standards” for the post-Hurricane Sandy rebuilding effort.
The updated Environmental Sensitivity Index maps will provide “important reference material for green infrastructure planning.”
…According to the task force, “Green infrastructure includes natural and/or restored features (e.g., wetlands or sand dune ecosystems).”
Notice the Agenda 21 buzzwords – resilience, environmental sensitivity, green. It always sounds wonderful; however, is their real motive to get Americans away from coastal areas? The Environmental Sensitivity Index maps mentioned in the article are based on areas that “could be” at risk. How objective is that? Any place could be at risk. On the other hand, are they stealing private property in order to build Agenda 21 communities on that land? Model communities that can be toured like Main Street at Disney World?
Interior Secretary Sally Jewell went to New York last week to announce the establishment of a new Science and Resilience Institute at Sandy-ravaged Jamaica Bay, in Queens. She also announced a $100 million competitive grant program to build “safer and more resilient communities.”
“In its wake, our nation was forced to face some very simple truths–that climate change is real, that it’s posing new and growing threats to our neighborhoods…”
She said the nation needs “the very best scientists” to “assist these communities and the ecology as well.”
The homeowners need the help of climate change scientists to rebuild their homes? How long will that take? Does anyone really believe that any of the homeowners will live on their property again? Or will their personal property be forfeited for the sake of a sand dune? Since when is a family and/or the right to own private property less important than a pile of sand?
By the way, FEMA is refusing to pay on its flood insurance policies. From the LI Herald: Sandy victims fight back, Loophole in flood insurance raises homeowners’ ire
U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand is calling on FEMA to review its policy and reverse the denials, saying that denying the claims “pulls the rug out from underneath homeowners who are relying on their flood insurance policies to repair and rebuild their homes.”
Why doesn’t FEMA want to pay? It’s not as if the government doesn’t like to borrow or print money. Perhaps they would rather just take the land?
Did you notice Interior Secretary Jewell’s reference to the dangers of “climate change”? What “they” are doing won’t be limited to the areas affected by Sandy. The U.S. Geological Survey is mapping the country’s coastlines for potential oil spills and to monitor how much sea levels are rising. Yeah, they really are. According to the cnsnews article:
That fits with the Obama administration requirement that all federally-funded rebuilding projects in the Sandy-affected region must account for future risks posed by rising sea levels.
According to the task force report on rebuilding Sandy-damaged areas, “Even a moderate amount of sea level rise will increase the flooding that coastal storm events cause.”
‘We must prepare communities across the country for the impacts of climate change, many of which are already being felt,” Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan blogged.
“Global warming” is the biggest scam of the century (so far). From a story in the UK’s Telegraph:
If there is one scientist who knows more about sea levels than anyone else in the world it is the Swedish geologist and physicist Nils-Axel Mörner, formerly chairman of the INQUA International Commission on Sea Level Change. And the uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner, who for 35 years has been using every known scientific method to study sea levels all over the globe, is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story.
Despite fluctuations down as well as up, “the sea is not rising,” he says. “It hasn’t risen in 50 years.” If there is any rise this century it will “not be more than 10cm (four inches), with an uncertainty of plus or minus 10cm”. And quite apart from examining the hard evidence, he says, the elementary laws of physics (latent heat needed to melt ice) tell us that the apocalypse conjured up by Al Gore and Co could not possibly come about.
Does anyone know how much money Al Gore’s made off his lies? According to the Telegraph:
Mr. Gore is poised to become the world’s first “carbon billionaire,” profiteering from government policies he supports that would direct billions of dollars to the business ventures he has invested in.
Representative Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, has claimed that Mr Gore stood to benefit personally from the energy and climate policies he was urging Congress to adopt.
Gore’s alleged net worth is $112,986,400. I’m fairly certain he isn’t the only one making big bucks off this lie – a very useful lie. Think of all “they” have accomplished by convincing the world that humans must save the planet from humanity. It certainly is a multipurpose ruse.
I’ve been wondering whether any of Sandy’s victims are still living in FEMA tents. The mainstream media would never tell us because it’s all about the agenda. So-called conspiracy theorists have long been warning that “they” will begin moving people away from coastal areas. Is it possible that Sandy was a manufactured storm designed to move people from that particular area? If so, which area is next?