It seems the president videotaped a message for the 50th annual convention of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), an organization which “was established in July 1981 by U.S-based members of the Muslim Brotherhood.”
According to Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs:
An FBI informant inside the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood network identified ISNA as a Brotherhood front as early as 1987. The source was documented as being “convinced” that the Brotherhood fronts have “a secret agenda which includes the spread of the Islamic Revolution to all non-Islamic governments in the world which does include the United States.”
I don’t really care if the U.S. president is a Muslim. However, it makes a difference to me if he has lied about it and if he is cooperating with an agenda that wants to force Americans into accepting Islam as their religion and/or legal system.
There’s also this from The Last Refuge, “Front Page of Egyptian Liberal Newspaper Claims Obama Is A Muslim Brotherhood Member, Says MB Leader Threatened To Release “Papers” Proving His Membership…”
Who is this guy we elected twice as president? We have no proof of his background – his birth, childhood, education, and life. All we have is the official narrative. He doesn’t seem to do anything except show up for photo-ops and to read a teleprompter. If you watch him try to answer press questions, his hesitations are not normal. He appears to be waiting for an answer. Is someone feeding him lines?
I am convinced that the president is a creation of the global elite, who chose him very early in his life, or before. Because of his race (although he only half African American, or so we’ve been told), he’s untouchable. Are racial tensions intentionally being stirred up as his poll numbers go down? Will anyone want to begin impeachment proceedings when the country appears to be on the verge of a racial war?
As for his most recent actions against Syria, “His administration is actively backing the radical Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida elements of the rebellion while leaving the Free Syrian Army high and dry, warns retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely.”
[While I am hesitant to put much faith in what retired military generals have to say about most situations, it’s sometimes useful to listen to them. What better spokesperson to sell a war to conservatives than a former general? By the way, all quotations today are from conservative websites.]
According to Vallely, the Free Syrian Army is the “true opposition force” in Syria. However, regarding the president, the general states:
“He is known, even in the Middle East and Syria, for supporting the Muslim Brotherhood as he did in Egypt. His trend is toward supporting those elements also in Syria.”
[Vallely] believes Obama has not been hoodwinked by the Muslim Brotherhood but simply embraces its ideology.
“I think they approve of it,” he said. “It’s their agenda to support the Muslim Brotherhood. You don’t have to look any further than what happened in Egypt. There’s a perfect example of how Obama screwed up royally, and that’s why the military has come in. They basically want to decimate the Muslim Brotherhood, whose ambition is Shariah government.”
For some reason, the current U.S. president is to some extent collaborating with the Muslim Brotherhood. Is one reason for this, perhaps, so a seemingly “conservative” politician can come on the scene and “save” the country and the world from what the “liberal” has done? Perhaps another member of the Bush family? It doesn’t really matter, as they all answer to the same masters.
Since the U.S. population leans to the right, phony conservatives can better garner support for “their” increasingly authoritarian schemes. Think of how much the last Bush president was able to accomplish under cover of “conservatism”. The liberal/conservative dichotomy sets up a good-politician/bad-politician routine through which “they” can manipulate the masses into happily going along.